Carbon Price of Solar

But what I take away from the combination of Borenstein and Wheeler’s paper is that in choosing between various kinds of renewable technologies, figuring out the carbon dioxide price point at which a particular renewable source of energy becomes cost-competitive with a fossil-fuel energy source is critical. If it’s $600 per ton, forget about it. If it’s $30, full speed ahead.

Andrew Winston on two studies on the cost of carbon required to make solar competitive.


One thought on “Carbon Price of Solar

  1. The thing missing from the analysis is the cost-curves of the different technologies. If you look at CURRENT cost of the technology, and CURRENT price of carbon then much of renewable energy is uncompetitive.

    The trick is to watch the cost-curve, what is the price decline in the technology. For example large-scale Wind is currently cheaper than distributed Solar. BUT wind is only decreasing in cost slowly, while solar is decreasing quickly (both through changes in technology, and volumes of production.

    With Garnault calling for cuts of 70-90% by 2050; and other scientific studies saying zero emissions is the only way to avoid dangerous climate change, we could be estimating that carbon gets very expensive indeed.

    The question then becomes at what point in the future does it become competitive presuming massive production volumes of whatever the technology is.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s