Dealing with Climate Change in India

Chandrashekhar Dasgupta, a Distinguished Fellow at TERI, writes a sensible op-ed in Business Standard on India and Climate Change.

Climate change is not a big issue in India at this point in time. The sheer size of the poverty issue overrides any other program. Combine that with the economic development policies, foreign policy (e.g. Kashmir issue), internal terrorism (e.g. the Maoists) and it is clear that climate change is not on the top of the agenda. This is rightly so.

In this op-ed, Dasgupta outlines the issue of climate change, the IPCC report, effect on India and possible policy actions.

He points out that “the wealthy, industrialised countries are responsible for causing climate change, the main victims will be the world’s poor. Developing countries are more vulnerable because they lack the financial and technological resources needed to cope with and adapt successfully to climate change”.

In this scenario, the first task of the government is adaptation and this can only be based on rapid, sustained development and poverty eradication.

Adaptation will require a wide range of responses, including a shift to drought resistant plant varieties, economical use of water resources, water conservation measures, watershed management, protection of coastlines and disaster management. Low-income countries will be unable to implement these measures on an adequate scale.

The second goal is to moderate the use of greenhouse gases through measures which will be economically beneficial and the funds are not diverted from poverty reduction and economic development needs. This is important because funds for development are scarce in India.

There are many areas where such possibilities exist. Cost-effective energy saving and energy efficiency programmes serve our development goals and also result in lowering emissions. Policies designed primarily to reduce local environmental pollution (such as the substitution of diesel by cleaner fuel in some of our major cities) can also lead to reduced greenhouse gas emissions. The promotion of nuclear, wind and solar power not only serves our energy security interests but also results in lower greenhouse gas emissions. In all these cases, measures designed primarily to promote our developmental objectives also yield important co-benefits for climate change mitigation.

Additional programs can be achieved through the Kyoto Clean Development Mechanism and Joint Implementation.

According to Dasgupta, the third leg of the strategy should concentrate on managing the rising expectations of industrialized nations to force India to cut down on its emissions.

If the demands of these developed countries are conceded, funds will be diverted from our national priority goals of development, poverty eradication and progress on local environmental issues like air and water quality. The rate of growth of the economy will be slowed down, with the result that India will remain highly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change.

To counter the argument of high greenhouse gases emitted by India due to its population he suggests a analogy based on food consumption.

This is like arguing that India should restrict its food consumption because its total calorie consumption is very large, even though the per capita intake is inadequate! India’s per capita carbon emissions are only one-eighth that of the EU and one-twentieth that of the US. The total figure is high only because India is a very large and populous country, with a population exceeding the combined total of the US, the European community, Russia and Japan.

As with everything in India, population exacerbates the climate change issue.


4 thoughts on “Dealing with Climate Change in India

  1. Pingback: India and Climate Change at Blogbharti

  2. I have to accept I was shocked at the way paper is used extensively in US as compared to India. The packaging too is very elaborate and hence uses a lot of environmental resources. So its not hard to believe that the per capita carbon emissions in India are 1/20th of those in US. Infact a very similar number was quoted by Gore in “An Inconvenient Truth”.
    But that does not absolve Indians from doing their bit to reduce carbon emissions. With the fast paced development thats happening, we do need to learn the lessons from other developed nations sooner rather than later. Switching off lights, turning off the computers at night, using energy efficient bulbs should become our second habit.
    The fact of the matter is – Earth is a whole, and any tiny bit we do, infact every tiny bit we do does make a difference.

  3. Hi Pooja:

    I do understand that we need to do everything we can in this scenario. However, I was talking from a national priority perspective and at a macro level of where the decisions are made at the state and national level for education, infrastructure, energy etc.

    At the individual level, everything is important. However, I grew in India where my father always alerted me to the importance of saving water and energy. It was easy to understand that part as there was always a scarcity of water and electricity.

    In India, it is common to recycle stuff, repair them and in fact even gift your old clothes to people. It is easy to do that stuff and is generally done.

    In that sense individually, in some areas, India is better off.

    But in terms of industrial production, efficiency in agriculture, labour productivity India needs to improve by geometric levels.

    I do understand your concern though.


  4. Pingback: World is Green : Business Strategy and Sustainability A commitee for Climate Change in India «

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s